Billionaire polluter David Koch: Global warming is good for you « Climate Progress
Billionaire polluter David Koch: Global warming is good for you « Climate Progress
Dear Mr. Ranck:
First, name two IPCC scientists that are as rich as you.
Second, name an Indian and a Chinese scientist that are as rich as you.
It is Americans that have exploited God's creation. We are the greedy ones.
The plants were doin...g just fine with the 1950s level of CO2. We are currently feeding some 7 billion people. Obesity in America is a HUGE problem.
Putting a carbon cap is not going to suck CO2 out of the air. What it will do is limit the amount of CO2 put IN the air by cars, trucks, & coal plants. Do you run your tractor and put the exhaust in your greenhouse? You know as well as I do that breathing exhaust can kill you and harm food and trees.
The CO2 level is rising partially because of deforestation & desertification. If the plants were able to suck up the amount of CO2 - then it would not be going up. Haiti and Afghanistan have been completely deforested. Much of Africa has been deforested. We have LOST millions of acres of tropical forest in this hemisphere. There is too much CO2 and not enough plants. This has altered the global chemistry.
It is not true to say that placing a cap on carbon would be ineffective. Or, scientists and engineers from all over the world have decided that this IS what we need to do.
Greed? The scientists I know are not billionaires or even millionaires. They are not making money on this. The IPCC scientists have struggled to obtain funding and have done research at much personal cost.
A carbon cap means limiting the amount of carbon. You do not spread carbon on your fields - you spread manure - an organic compound. - whether it is a component of CO2.
Organic compound means a compound that contains carbon.
I have traveled to China and India. You are wrong to criticize them as "partying." The Indian and Chinese scientists are just as concerned about the environment as we are.
The party is over. Americans have been largely responsible - even though we are only 300 M people.
I saw 2 Hummers drive down Charlotte St. in Lancaster.
The people in India and China ride bicycles. I have participated in transportation studies in Shanghai and I know this to be true.
There are many hungry in the world. If we do not cap carbon - this will increase the amount of environmental refugees. Haitians are unable to feed themselves because the island has been deforested.
Dear Mr. Ranck:
First, name two IPCC scientists that are as rich as you.
Second, name an Indian and a Chinese scientist that are as rich as you.
It is Americans that have exploited God's creation. We are the greedy ones.
The plants were doin...g just fine with the 1950s level of CO2. We are currently feeding some 7 billion people. Obesity in America is a HUGE problem.
Putting a carbon cap is not going to suck CO2 out of the air. What it will do is limit the amount of CO2 put IN the air by cars, trucks, & coal plants. Do you run your tractor and put the exhaust in your greenhouse? You know as well as I do that breathing exhaust can kill you and harm food and trees.
The CO2 level is rising partially because of deforestation & desertification. If the plants were able to suck up the amount of CO2 - then it would not be going up. Haiti and Afghanistan have been completely deforested. Much of Africa has been deforested. We have LOST millions of acres of tropical forest in this hemisphere. There is too much CO2 and not enough plants. This has altered the global chemistry.
It is not true to say that placing a cap on carbon would be ineffective. Or, scientists and engineers from all over the world have decided that this IS what we need to do.
Greed? The scientists I know are not billionaires or even millionaires. They are not making money on this. The IPCC scientists have struggled to obtain funding and have done research at much personal cost.
A carbon cap means limiting the amount of carbon. You do not spread carbon on your fields - you spread manure - an organic compound. - whether it is a component of CO2.
Organic compound means a compound that contains carbon.
I have traveled to China and India. You are wrong to criticize them as "partying." The Indian and Chinese scientists are just as concerned about the environment as we are.
The party is over. Americans have been largely responsible - even though we are only 300 M people.
I saw 2 Hummers drive down Charlotte St. in Lancaster.
The people in India and China ride bicycles. I have participated in transportation studies in Shanghai and I know this to be true.
There are many hungry in the world. If we do not cap carbon - this will increase the amount of environmental refugees. Haitians are unable to feed themselves because the island has been deforested.
posted by Unknown | 6:16 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home